ok

na

NA

ok

NA

NA

na

na

no

👍

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

x

S

i

t

The gap between the supply and demand for generative AI-literate employees can be attributed to several factors: ### **Reasons for the Gap** 1. **Rapid Advancement of Technology**: Generative AI has evolved at a breakneck pace, and many education systems and training programs haven't kept up with the speed of change. 2. **Specialized Knowledge Requirements**: Generative AI involves complex concepts such as neural networks, prompt engineering, large language models (LLMs), and domain-specific adaptations, which require a strong foundation in mathematics, programming, and machine learning. 3. **Limited Expertise Pool**: The field of AI is relatively new, and there are fewer professionals with advanced expertise in generative AI as compared to traditional software development or data science roles. 4. **High Demand Across Industries**: As more industries recognize the transformative potential of generative AI, demand for these skills has skyrocketed, leading to competition for the limited available talent. 5. **Education Lag**: Academic programs and certifications often take time to develop and adapt, meaning there are fewer graduates with direct generative AI training. --- ### **How Organizations Can Address This Gap** 1. **Invest in Upskilling Current Employees**: - **Workshops and Bootcamps**: Conduct intensive training programs focused on generative AI tools, technologies, and practical applications. - **Online Learning Platforms**: Encourage employees to complete courses on platforms like Coursera, Udemy, and edX, which offer specialized AI tracks. - **Internal Mentorship**: Create mentorship programs where experienced AI professionals within the organization can train less experienced staff. 2. **Foster a Learning Culture**: - Encourage experimentation with generative AI tools like ChatGPT, DALL·E, or MidJourney for day-to-day tasks to build familiarity. - Provide incentives for employees to innovate and explore AI applications relevant to their roles. 3. **Partner with Academic Institutions**: Collaborate with universities and research institutions to offer customized training programs or internships that align with organizational needs. 4. **Leverage No-Code and Low-Code Platforms**: Provide employees with access to user-friendly AI tools that don’t require deep technical expertise, allowing non-technical staff to integrate generative AI into their work. 5. **Cross-Disciplinary Training**: Since generative AI intersects with various fields, encourage employees from diverse backgrounds (e.g., marketing, HR, and design) to understand how generative AI can apply to their domains. 6. **Build AI Awareness at All Levels**: Offer high-level sessions for leadership and strategic teams to understand the potential and limitations of generative AI, enabling better decision-making and strategic alignment. By adopting a multifaceted approach, organizations can close the skills gap and build a workforce capable of leveraging the full potential of generative AI.

Once again, an entire course on AI has NO MENTION AT ALL about the training datasets using already copywrited or trademarked intellectual property. These companies will go to ANY length to avoid mentioning what they have done: stealing millions of images from hard-working creative people to train their models. They perform incredibly delicate, elaborate dances around the subject, even within their own AI modules on the ethics of AI (!!) supposedly to address those ethical concerns, but they frame it as "who owns the images AI produces?" instead of asking "should these AI companies recompense artists for using their works without their permission?" This dance is sickening to me -- late-stage capitalism at its absolute worst. Shame. Shame on IBM.