Most of the questions from "Foundations of SAFe and Lean Principles Quiz" were not based on the material presented in the videos or the reading sections. The Foundations of SAFe and Lean Principles videos were not entertaining and not eye opening for SAFe beginners, the only reason I understood some concepts was because I already work with a similar framework BCGs Annual Business Reviews/Quarterly Business Reviews.

More examples of Aafe can be given. This is just reading text that can eb found anywhere on Web

It is very comprehensive and easy to follow. Love how you can start, stop and back up .

Jump start SAFe learning! Glad I took time to complete the course.

Useful one

So Good

nice

Good

Module 1 - The course is interesting. The exchanges with Coach help us to understand and reflect on the subjects covered. However, I don't understand the point of asking questions on subjects that will be covered in future modules. It's demotivating for learners. I hope the quizz on others modules won't be the same.

Nice introduction to understand SAFe, even if videos are a bit monotonous. Unfortunately References for further reading quite often lead to articles from different web portals requiring paid registration.

Good overall introduction to SAFe. However, some of the quiz questions are related to current events and may become outdated quickly and/or not referenced in the training material.

This course is good for gaining basic knowledge. The images used in the slides are not clear enough, should have been better.

There are some questions in quiz that are not covered in course. For example what is 'MURA' . may be i missed something

Some of the quiz answers appear incorrect and cover material not presented

The article on history of Agile has many inaccuracies "It is called the manifesto for agile software development, not the Agile Manifesto. The history for the manifesto is published alongside it so why not link and cite the original source? SCRUM, XP, Kanban and other new ways of working for software development already existed (some as early as 1950's) before manifesto for agile software development was written in 2001. The manifesto itself is a set of 4 values and 12 principles, that these new ways of working had in common and that the group of men who authored the manifesto could all agree upon. It's not a methodology or framework. The use of the frameworks and methodologies, that did align on these values & principles, increased after the manifesto was written.

Gives a reasonable foundation for the basics of SAFe framework. However, while the syllabus progresses in a logical manner, the content is at time disjointed. Also, most of the videos are 98% verbatim reading of the slides without further explanation or expansion on the topics. Diagrams are also usually fuzzy and unreadable on screen. Further reading links often lead to "infomercial" pages, some littered with ads and distracting pop-ups - you'd think that a course would aim at more solid references. With little polish and expansion, this module could be really valuable to set the scene for further, well-grounded learning.

The course provided a good overview but the presentation by the teacher was lacking. There were audio issues as well as distractions, including how the slides were highlighted and talked through with moving mouse cursor or having the cursor in the way of content.

content is interesting but the quiz questions often cover things that have not been covered in the course!

some review questions ask about subject or concepts that are not taught

The training has a lot of material, there is a lot of background noise.

The course is basically the instructor reading a bunch of PowerPoints. It lacks real world examples and the reference of where all the content used in the PowerPoints are coming from. There are indeed some useful information on this course, but it requires the user to have basic knowledge of Agile.

Poorly designed, superficial, more concerned with asking trick questions and assigning a certificate than actually teach anything. Lots of the questions were not even covered in the training material! Does introduce some of the concepts well enough, though.

The lessons presented did not cover the test material. There is a disconnect between the course materials and the tests as well. The presenter appears to be reading the slides and not providing useful information to address the graded assignments.

The instructor only reads the text in his slides and does not explain further. The "Read more" links send you to articles that sometimes have nothing to do with the subject. It gives a good base knowledge but the standard is low.

Knowledge in Agile Framework is a pre from my point of view. Training provides basic information about SAFe and how it is linked to Agile. I miss some practical examples. Didactics and material must be improved.